Home
Editorial
Columns
Contributions
Advertising
Photo Gallery
Back Issues
About Us/History
Contact
A longtime resident of Uxbridge, Ted Barris has written professionally for 40 years - for radio, television, magazines and newspapers. The "Barris Beat" column began in the 1950s when his father Alex wrote for the Globe and Mail. Ted continues the tradition of offering a positive view of his community. He has written 16 non-fiction books of Canadian history and teaches journalism at Centennial College in Toronto. |
  |
Previous
Oct 29, 2009
Oct 22, 2009
Oct 15, 2009
Oct 8, 2009
Oct 1, 2009
Sept 10, 2009
Sept 06, 2009
Aug 27, 2009
Aug 20, 2009
Aug 13, 2009
Aug 06, 2009
July 30, 2009
July 23, 2009
July 16, 2009
July 9, 2009
June 18, 2009
June 6, 2009
May 28, 2009
May 14, 2009
May 07, 2009
April 30, 2009
April 23, 2009
April 16, 2009
April 09, 2009
April 02, 2009
March 26, 2009
March 19, 2009
March 12, 2009
March 05, 2009
Feb 26, 2009
Feb 19, 2009
Feb 05, 2009
Jan 29, 2009
Jan 21, 2009
Jan 15, 2009
Jan 08, 2009
Dec 24 2008 |
The meaning of silence
Last Sunday, I spoke to a midday session of the International Writers' Festival in Ottawa. I projected images of veterans I have known onto a movie screen. Then, I told stories about the men's and women's nearly total reluctance to speak about their wartime experiences. It's the subject of my latest book, Breaking the Silence. And I finished my talk this way:
“I've spent many of the past 30 years writing the stories of battle,” I said. “In this latest work, I've attempted to write about the battle to get the stories.”
In my talk, I offered several key illustrations of the way Canadian veterans have almost universally refused to share with their families and civilian friends the extraordinary moments of their war. Among the examples of this unwritten code of silence, I cited the story of my closest air force friend Charley Fox. Though he had completed 234 successful sorties in air force Spitfires and won two Distinguished Flying Crosses, he rarely spoke about his successful airborne attack on the highest ranking and most important German general in occupied France, Erwin Rommel.
Similarly, I recalled for that Ottawa audience the story of a Second World War vet who re-mustered at the start of the Korean War. Hal Merrithew, a lieutenant in the Royal 22nd Regiment, led a platoon of pioneer (mine-laying and mine-defusing) troops along the front-line at the 38th parallel. In one heroic operation, Lt. Merrithew had guided his men into a minefield to retrieve the dead and wounded from a night-time misadventure in No Man's Land. The experience left Merrithew sobbing - I thought - over the horrific images of the rescue. But no, it turned out that his distress had come from his inability to reconnect - even after 50 years and despite every effort - with the men who'd shared that horrific night with him in Korea.
And towards the end of my talk, I shared with that audience a recounting of my face-to-face interviews with three Canadian veterans of the Afghanistan mission. All three had been at a place called Tarnak Farm, outside Kandahar, where on April 17, 2002, a U.S. fighter jet fired a laser-guided 500-pound bomb at the Canadians - killing four and wounding another half dozen in the so-called “friendly fire” incident. Each of the men I interviewed had vivid memories still haunting him; each had paid a physical and emotional price in his survival of the attack; and each recognized the incident had changed him permanently.
“I'd like to say it has affected me for the best,” one of them said. “I'd be lying if I said that.”
At any rate, following my talk I took questions. Several veterans wanted to know more about the airman I mentioned. Others were curious if the Korean War vets had ever re-united. And then a woman put her hand and asked a favour of me.
“My partner left for Afghanistan a month ago,” she said. “What am I supposed to do when he comes home?”
She stopped me dead. I wasn't quite sure where to begin. In all my lectures, talks and media interviews I'd never been asked that before. I began by cautioning her that I was not a professional psychologist, nor an expert in post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). I said all I could do was offer her suggestions of things to consider upon his return: giving him time to sort things out, becoming as knowledgeable as she could about what her partner had faced, ensuring he knew that she wanted to understand his war experience, and choosing the right time and place to share it.
A few moments later another woman put her hand up. She explained that her husband had served in the Vietnam War in the 1970s and that he had suffered severe PTSD. She went on to explain that as a consequence of their experience, she had become a full-time certified trauma specialist.
“What you just said to that woman,” she pointed out, “was exactly the right procedure in such circumstances.”
Late that Sunday night, as I travelled home, I reflected on the day's events. I had related some of my own battles to get the stories of veterans. I had sparked some lively discussion on a difficult topic - veterans' collective silence. I had even earned a bit of praise for offering constructive advice to the family of a soon-to-be Canadian veteran. But it all seemed for nothing.
That night we learned that another Canadian soldier had died in Afghanistan. And another family would spend the approaching Nov. 11 Remembrance Day mourning and fearing a different kind of silence - the silence of losing a loved one.
|